Received-SPF: none (charybdis.ellipsis.cx: domain of messages-bounces@forums.vassalengine.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
To: VASSAL Engine Forums Mailing List <messages@forums.vassalengine.org>
Subject: Re: [Developers]Re: Adding developers?
In-reply-to: <1267473003.m2f.17543@www.vassalengine.org>
References: <1267171317.m2f.17507@www.vassalengine.org>
	<1267473003.m2f.17543@www.vassalengine.org>
Comments: In-reply-to "wlk" <messages@forums.vassalengine.org>
	message dated "Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:50:03 -0800."
From: Joel Uckelman <uckelman@nomic.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:42:28 +0100
Message-Id: <20100302094228.33F0310091@charybdis.ellipsis.cx>
Precedence: list
Reply-To: VASSAL Engine Forums Mailing List <messages@forums.vassalengine.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: messages-bounces@forums.vassalengine.org
Errors-To: messages-bounces@forums.vassalengine.org

Thus spake "wlk":
> 
> uckelman wrote:
> > How close are you guys to a 3.1-compatble release, BTW? We've had at least
> > one bug report every day since the release of 3.1.0 about VASL being
> > incompatible with 3.1...
> 
> 
> Actually, I fixed like 5 bugs now, and there's none left I am aware of, at le
> ast the ones related to VASL binaries.
> I'm daily using 5.9 with 3.1.13 and didn't notice anything wrong.
> We were waiting for 3.1.14 to be released to publish VASL 5.9.
> 

Oh! I didn't know you were waiting for 3.1.14. I can put together a test
build tonight, and if people try it out to confirm that it's ok, we can
release tomorrow.
 
-- 
J.

_______________________________________________
Messages mailing list
Messages@forums.vassalengine.org
http://forums.vassalengine.org/mailman/listinfo/messages_forums.vassalengine.org